Federal Circuitry

October 23, 2023 - Last Week in the Federal Circuit
Recently in the Federal Circuit: More on Indefiniteness in IPRs
By: Rachel S. Dolphin
Means-plus-function claim elements can be a sticky wicket during an inter partes review, to borrow a phrase from the cricket lovers out there. These are claim elements drafted under 35 U.S.C. § 112(f) (or its predecessor paragraph 6) that recite an element of a combination
... ›
October 16, 2023 - Last Week in the Federal Circuit
Recently in the Federal Circuit: Reasonable Expectation of Success May Not Be So Spooky After All
By: Shaun Patrick deLacy
With Halloween fast approaching, many of us are asking the age-old question: “Is this decoration too heavy to hang with this [hook/tape/blue tack/string around a too-thin tree branch]?” The Federal Circuit faced a similar conundrum in one recent case and found that an ordinary
... ›
October 09, 2023 - Last Week in the Federal Circuit
Recently in the Federal Circuit: Broadening Claims in IPRs
By: Aaron D. Bray
Our case this week, at first glance, features a typical appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board and the construction of the jingle-worthy term “connection rejection message” in the context of two patents involving cellular telecommunications systems. But as discussed below, what may
... ›
September 15, 2023 - Last Week in the Federal Circuit
Recently in the Federal Circuit: The New Board Construction Conundrum
By: Nicole M. Ang
If you’ve ever wondered how they keep implanted medical devices from becoming dead weight when the batteries run out, this recent Federal Circuit decision addresses one solution—wireless charging through the skin! It also sheds light on a petitioner’s options when the Patent Trial and Appeal
... ›
August 11, 2023 - Last Week in the Federal Circuit
Last Week In The Federal Circuit (July 31 – August 4): Federal Circuit Reminds To Focus On The Claims
By: Tait Karsten Anderson
This week’s case of the (recent) week could serve as a crash course in several areas of patent law. It touches on Hatch-Waxman litigation and the Orange Book, claim construction, anticipation/obviousness, written description and enablement, infringement, induced infringement, and a parallel IPR proceeding. But as discussed
... ›
July 21, 2023 - Last Week in the Federal Circuit
Last Week In The Federal Circuit (July 10 – July 14): An Applicant Gets Grilled On The Original Patent Requirement
With summer in full swing, it’s the perfect time to hang out in the pool and grill some burgers. Our case of the week involves an invention for doing both of those activities at the same time—and provides some insight on when claims can be
... ›
July 14, 2023 - Last Week in the Federal Circuit
Last Week In The Federal Circuit (July 3 – July 7): Three Lawsuits, Still No Claim Preclusion
Fans of civil procedure will want to check out our case of the week, which offers an interesting discussion of the requirements for claim preclusion in patent infringement suits—and a reminder about the distinctions between direct and induced infringement. Case of the week: Inguran,
... ›
June 16, 2023 - Last Week in the Federal Circuit
Last Week In The Federal Circuit (June 5 – June 9): A Nexus For Your Lexus
Summer is finally kicking into gear, but the Federal Circuit isn’t on vacation yet. Last week the Court issued several interesting decisions—including our case of the week, which analyzes the nexus requirement for objective evidence of nonobviousness. Case of the week: Yita LLC v. MacNeil
... ›
May 22, 2023 - Last Week in the Federal Circuit
Last Week In The Federal Circuit (May 15 – May 19): Joint Inventorship and Insignificant Contributions
By: Robert M. Paris
This week’s bacon-related case of the week may lack a certain recognizable savory smell, but it still manages to pack some helpful insights on the law of joint inventorship. Case of the (recent) week: HIP, Inc. v. Hormel Foods Corporation , No. 22-1696 Panel:
... ›
April 25, 2023 - Last Week in the Federal Circuit
Last Week In The Federal Circuit (April 17 – April 21): Inherent Limits And Patent Enablement
By: Seth W. Lloyd
We’re still waiting for the Supreme Court to issue its decision in Amgen v. Sanofi. But in the meantime, the Federal Circuit continues to provide insights into 35 U.S.C. § 112’s requirement to “enable” persons of skill in the art to “make and use” a
... ›

Topic Archives: Last Week in the Federal Circuit

Recently in the Federal Circuit: More on Indefiniteness in IPRs

By: Rachel S. Dolphin

Recently in the Federal Circuit: Reasonable Expectation of Success May Not Be So Spooky After All

By: Shaun Patrick deLacy

Recently in the Federal Circuit: Broadening Claims in IPRs

By: Aaron D. Bray

Recently in the Federal Circuit: The New Board Construction Conundrum

By: Nicole M. Ang

Last Week In The Federal Circuit (July 31 – August 4): Federal Circuit Reminds To Focus On The Claims

By: Tait Karsten Anderson

Last Week In The Federal Circuit (July 10 – July 14): An Applicant Gets Grilled On The Original Patent Requirement

Last Week In The Federal Circuit (July 3 – July 7): Three Lawsuits, Still No Claim Preclusion

Last Week In The Federal Circuit (June 5 – June 9): A Nexus For Your Lexus

Last Week In The Federal Circuit (May 15 – May 19): Joint Inventorship and Insignificant Contributions

By: Robert M. Paris

Last Week In The Federal Circuit (April 17 – April 21): Inherent Limits And Patent Enablement

By: Seth W. Lloyd